System architect and custodian.
Starging is not a bank, investment fund, or rating agency. It designs the architecture, rules, and custody conditions that connect observable reality with economically admissible value.
Design and Custody of Value Systems
REALITY
MADE VALUE.
Starging designs and safeguards economic infrastructure to reduce uncertainty between observable reality and capital.
RealityVerifiable value
Institutional identity
What is Starging?
Starging designs and safeguards Integrated Value Systems. It acts as the authority for economic admissibility within IVS, defining the conditions under which evidence from observable production may inform valuation and financial processes without becoming detached from reality.
Conceived by Franco Righetti.
Architect of IVSHe conceived Starging as an institutional response to the structural distance between real production, evidence, valuation, and capital.
Miami, Florida.
United StatesIts headquarters anchors an architecture designed to operate across the Americas and expand progressively worldwide.
Reducing uncertainty from reality to capital.
Its purpose is to make productive reality observable, evidence traceable, risk more measurable, and value admissible within a governed financial infrastructure.
From reality to capital.
IVS defines a verifiable sequence for observing production, assessing data as evidence, measuring risk, and admitting value within a custody architecture.
01REALITY→
02DATA→
03EVIDENCE→
04RISK→
05VALUATION→
06CAPITAL↗
A layered architecture.
Each layer performs a defined function. Admissibility membranes coordinate the transfer of information, value, and responsibility between them.
Layer 0 · Economic perimeter
Reality before its representation.
Defines what exists, what can be observed, and the scope within which production enters the economic system.
Representation.
Monetary continuity.
Within IVS, DRT and DDV perform complementary functions. Evidence may support an eligibility review; monetary consequences require their own documented authorization.
DRT · Dynamic Reality Token
A traceable representation.
A DRT identifies what it represents: a productive state, an identified right, or a contractual commitment. It records evidence, uncertainty, permitted uses, event history, and any available valuation. Each material update identifies its cause: a physical event, new evidence, a correction, or a change in rights, models, or rules.
SCIENC3S is responsible for DRT within the architecture. Scientific validation remains distinct from financial decision-making. A versioned registry demonstrator does not by itself establish an implemented cryptographic token, transferability, or legal ownership.
DDV · Living Digital Money
A defined monetary function.
DDV is designed as a renewable monetary system that aims for continuity and universal access. Its design requires explicit obligations and holder rights, eligible and assignable backing, liquidity, rules for absorbing losses, and authorized custody responses.
Economics Trends is responsible for DDV from C2 through C4: backing eligibility and allocation, financial assessment, liquidity, and systemic limits. Creating or updating a DRT does not create money, approve credit, or provide payment resources.
Direction, integration, and audit. Starging maintains the architecture and interfaces, coordinates responsibilities, and oversees auditing across the system, with separation from the decisions being reviewed. Independent validation requires a third party free from relevant conflicts of interest.
Observable reality · Verifiable value
Reality takes economic form.
Observation converts physical production into measurable evidence; evidence reduces uncertainty and enables admissible valuation.
Designed for scale. Built for progressive bankability.
The architecture has a twenty-year deployment horizon. Initial structuring capital is intended to build the institutional and technical capacity needed to pursue financing in successive stages.
US$60MTarget global structuring capital
20 yearsDeployment horizon
1B devicesLong-term digital twin target
These figures describe planning targets, not capital raised, financing committed, or devices deployed.
Economic admissibility demonstrator
Testing the path from an observable crop to a financeable asset.
The vineyard demonstrator illustrates how soil, vigor, and canopy observations could inform assessments of uncertainty, risk, and value for a standing crop. The standing crop is the proposed asset; the land is outside the valuation scope.
Demonstration with synthetic data. The images are illustrative. This presentation does not establish a verified crop valuation, empirical validation, or lending approval. It is not an offer to purchase or extend credit. Any financing outcome requires independently verifiable evidence and the relevant institutional assessment.
Observation points
TARGET RESOLUTION: 10 MILLUSTRATIVE MODEL
Documents & LinkedIn.
Explore the IVS test proposal and EVO financial framework, or connect with Franco Righetti on LinkedIn for institutional correspondence.
Bankability test proposal · English
From Observable Reality to Bankable Evidence
A testable hypothesis for assessing whether additional traceable evidence changes uncertainty, risk, and access to financing for an existing productive asset. It proposes a test, not an investment, and does not assume a positive outcome.
Financial framework · English
Economics of Observable Value
The financial edition translates EVO’s formal framework into risk management, capital markets, and prudential regulation.
Download financial editionContinue on LinkedIn
Follow the work. Join the exchange.
Follow Franco Righetti on LinkedIn for updates on Starging, IVS, and observable value. Use LinkedIn to begin institutional correspondence or request further documentation.
Contact Franco Righetti